Went to look at an Impreza today...

Dup

Dup

Soldato
Joined
10 Mar 2006
Posts
11,237
Location
East Lancs
In my opinion the Sexiest skyline has to be the KPGC110 GTR.





I think the 32 is the best of the 90's Skylines, I agree with the positive things mentioned in this thread. It's just a shame that movies like The Fast and the Furious glorified the skyline and turned them into a sought after car, rather than a fun family sleeper before hand.

I love the 32's front coupled with the 33's rear.



Here's a 32 I ran into down the M6:

http://www.duperouzel.co.uk/misc/skyline1.jpg
http://www.duperouzel.co.uk/misc/skyline2.jpg
http://www.duperouzel.co.uk/misc/skyline3.jpg
http://www.duperouzel.co.uk/misc/skyline4.jpg

They have a such a road presence and to be honest, they're not that big compared to other cars.
 
Last edited:
Man of Honour
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
50,384
Location
Plymouth
Stonedofmoo said:
The R32 is just an ancient and dated looking Japaneese car. I dont see why people like the looks of it

At least the R33 and 34 look up-to-date

Isn't that a Pulsar GTI-R in your sig?....

Pot, meet mr kettle, he's black you know ;)

I love the Skyline to a point, although it's too "fast and furious" now for me :(
 
Soldato
Joined
24 Oct 2002
Posts
6,242
Location
Portsmouth
lol, yes but thats like saying the Lancia Delta Integrale is dated looking or the Escort Cosworth or any other rally road cars that are purpose built for the time they came from compared to modern cars.

Whereas the R32 Skyline is simply a dated looking Japaneese saloon car modelled along the lines of many other saloon cars of the day, but with an awesome performance reputation

Each to their own at the end of the day. R34 all the way for me, looks lovely.
 

olv

olv

Soldato
Joined
12 Jan 2005
Posts
5,295
Location
london
DreXeL said:
The R33 just looks like an overweight S14A, and the R34 looks too 'messy'. And both are far too lardy.

The 32 on the other hand isn't too heavy, has nice, clean lines and has cool, 'old school' look.

The real old-school Skylines are the best though, like the R30 I posted a while back :cool:

I think the only skyline i've liked is an R33 you posted ages ago. A heavily modded black one. Maybe it caught fire at a track day? Can't really remember. It looked nice though.
 
Permabanned
Joined
9 May 2005
Posts
20,834
Location
NE8
Stonedofmoo said:
lol, yes but thats like saying the Lancia Delta Integrale is dated looking or the Escort Cosworth or any other rally road cars that are purpose built for the time they came from compared to modern cars.

Whereas the R32 Skyline is simply a dated looking Japaneese saloon car modelled along the lines of many other saloon cars of the day, but with an awesome performance reputation

Each to their own at the end of the day. R34 all the way for me, looks lovely.

Hahahaha...You do know about the Skyline's racing history, right?

It won at Bathurst so they changed the rules and made it run heavier.

It won the next year so they changed the rules and made it run heavier.

It won the next year so they changed the rules and banned it.

So your reason for the GTI-R being exempt from the 'old Japanese car' slating is it's motorsport 'pedigree' but the R32, with a more distinguished race history than the Sunny/Pulsar is slated...Riiiiiiight...

*n
 
Soldato
Joined
24 Oct 2002
Posts
6,242
Location
Portsmouth
'hahahahhahahahahha' etc yes I know all about the Skylines racing pedigree thanks, what does your comment have to do with anything
When was I commenting on it's race heritage?

I said it was designed like loads of other saloon cars of the day and nothing special to look at
 
Permabanned
Joined
9 May 2005
Posts
20,834
Location
NE8
thats like saying the Lancia Delta Integrale is dated looking or the Escort Cosworth or any other rally road cars that are purpose built for the time they came from

...The Skyline was purpose-built also.

The GTI-R and Integrale were designed like lots of similarly-aged hatchbacks...

*n
 
Soldato
Joined
24 Oct 2002
Posts
6,242
Location
Portsmouth
Yeah I understand that, but the Pulsar is uninspired chasis to begin with which is then unavoidably redesigned in GTI-R form to meet it's rallying requirements (intake for intercooler, spoiler down downforce etc)

Where as the Skyline just happened to look like the cars of the time because thats what the designers were aiming at, and since that was about 16-17 years ago - it looks dated.

Thats what I meant.
 
Permabanned
Joined
9 May 2005
Posts
20,834
Location
NE8
Stonedofmoo said:
Yeah I understand that, but the Pulsar is uninspired chasis to begin with which is then unavoidably redesigned in GTI-R form to meet it's rallying requirements (intake for intercooler, spoiler down downforce etc)

The Skyline is an average car to begine with which is then redesigned in GTR form to meet it's racing requirements (engine, drivetrain, chassis, aerodynamic package, suspension...

Where as the Skyline just happened to look like the cars of the time because thats what the designers were aiming at, and since that was about 16-17 years ago - it looks dated.

Thats what I meant.

The exact same thing applies to the GTI-R. It looks like an early 90s hatchback with a bodykit because that is what it is. The GTR looks like a late eighties saloon with a bodykit because that what it is.

*n
 
Man of Honour
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
50,384
Location
Plymouth
Stonedofmoo said:
lol, yes but thats like saying the Lancia Delta Integrale is dated looking or the Escort Cosworth or any other rally road cars that are purpose built for the time they came from compared to modern cars.

Whereas the R32 Skyline is simply a dated looking Japaneese saloon car modelled along the lines of many other saloon cars of the day, but with an awesome performance reputation

Each to their own at the end of the day. R34 all the way for me, looks lovely.

The integrale and cosworth are dated looking. They, just like the Skyline, are standard cars with bodykit additions, just as the Pulsar is.

They are all, ultimately, late 80's/early 90's shopping cars with performance addons.

Doesn't mean people can't like/dislike the way they look, I just found it ironic that you criticised the R32 while having the pulsar there, because they suffer exactly the same thing.
 
Soldato
Joined
19 Oct 2002
Posts
16,490
Location
Shakespeare’s County
Dolph said:
The integrale and cosworth are dated looking. They, just like the Skyline, are standard cars with bodykit additions, just as the Pulsar is.

They are all, ultimately, late 80's/early 90's shopping cars with performance addons.

Doesn't mean people can't like/dislike the way they look, I just found it ironic that you criticised the R32 while having the pulsar there, because they suffer exactly the same thing.

I dont find it ironic, the R32 look horrificly ugly in my book, big overhanging panels on wheels that always look too small, the Sunny isnt pretty but its brutally functional it how it looks and it well proportioned.

Do like the R33 and R34s, but the 32 does nothing for me.
 
Permabanned
Joined
9 May 2005
Posts
20,834
Location
NE8
Jonnycoupe said:
I dont find it ironic, the R32 look horrificly ugly in my book, big overhanging panels on wheels that always look too small, the Sunny isnt pretty but its brutally functional it how it looks and it well proportioned.

That's subjective though...All the the cars being discussed (Escort Cosworth, Sunny GTI-R, Skyline GTR and Delta Integrale) are standard saloons or hatches with functional additions which does make it ironic.

Your personal opinion on the above does not change the fact that they are all 'modified', range-topping equivelants of very mundane cars.

*n
 
Man of Honour
Joined
17 Oct 2002
Posts
50,384
Location
Plymouth
Jonnycoupe said:
I dont find it ironic, the R32 look horrificly ugly in my book, big overhanging panels on wheels that always look too small, the Sunny isnt pretty but its brutally functional it how it looks and it well proportioned.

Do like the R33 and R34s, but the 32 does nothing for me.

But that's a criticism of the car itself, rather than saying you don't like it because it just looks like a normal car with a bodykit.

That's where the irony comes for me.

None of the cars listed go in the "pretty" category, and if it wasn't for their reputation for other things, would probably be laughed at something chronic, to dismiss one because it looks like a car with a bodykit while embracing another on that basis is where the irony comes in.
 
Back
Top Bottom