1. This site uses cookies. By continuing to use this site, you are agreeing to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Western Digital 8MB or 16MB cache?

Discussion in 'Storage Drives' started by badbob, 5 Feb 2006.

  1. badbob

    PermaBanned

    Joined: 27 Jan 2006

    Posts: 7,298

    Looking into a 4 way bank of hard drives (non raid) I noticed you can get 8MB and 16MB hard drives with internal 8MB and 16MB cache. Does it really make a difference? I believe windows does caching itself, so HD cache shouldn't matter so much? 250MB 16MB cache or 400MB 8MB cache drive.

    I know back in the day of cached in DOS IDE controllers performance increase was like 1000%, but since Windows 95 took over alot faster.
     
  2. benjo plz.

    Capodecina

    Joined: 15 Jan 2004

    Posts: 14,208

    Location: Hall

    Yes it does make a difference, 16mb will be better tbh.
     
  3. sniperpenguin

    Associate

    Joined: 3 Feb 2006

    Posts: 30

    As the size of a drive has increased, then the cache size has become more important. However, if the drives are purely for storage, then you wont miss it :)

    If they are getting a hammering i.e encoding, photoshop scratch disk, video editing, then go for the higher cache.