Please remember that any mention of competitors, hinting at competitors or offering to provide details of competitors will result in an account suspension. The full rules can be found under the 'Terms and Rules' link in the bottom right corner of your screen. Just don't mention competitors in any way, shape or form and you'll be OK.
I'm going to preface this by saying I care about RIS as much as i care about DLSS, neither of them are selling points as far as i am concerned. What i do care about is consistency.You are talking about a driver option I assume?
DLSS and RTX are actually in-game graphics options. That's a bit different.
HWUB bias appears to be based on a persons own bias. If you like Nvidia they are AMD bias. If you like AMD they are Nvidia bias. Standard affairSure ae some hot takes in this thread about HWUB being AMD biased.
They destroyed amd in the 6900xt review and have blasted them repeatedly over the msrp fiasco.
I really want someone to do a DLSS vs Native but Native is an AMD GPU. And to do it at all resolutions not just 4k.I'd rather these reviewers did do a proper job and show such detail. I'd like to know what offers the better IQ without doing all the research myself.
Hardware unboxed : "We will not be testing this card with DLSS, or any RT features. This is because we got an flaming AMD dingo in the back, and he payed us not toooooooo."
Nvidia: "Oh you are off the future FE priority review list"
Hardware unboxed : "Oh bugger me with a fish pole I didn't expect that....this is not faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaiiiirrrrrrrr"
To be clear, this really won't impact our reviews and opinions in any way. We won't start hating Nvidia, this isn't the first time companies have cut us off, and it hasn't affected our thoughts on products previously
Well DLSS 2.0 is often better than native resolution, mainly due to the artifacts that TAA bring to an image.
Can you imagine how long reviews would take it they had to test every driver option? Where does it end?
That's why it matters whether its native to the game or not.
I do agree that Hardware Unboxed shouldn't be punished in this way by Nvidia though.
HWUB bias appears to be based on a persons own bias. If you like Nvidia they are AMD bias. If you like AMD they are Nvidia bias. Standard affair
Gamers Nexus said:Not OK for them to say anything like that. The specific "should your editorial direction change" is a huge cross over a big red line. We only have like 4 RT benchmarks in our suite and give it about 2 minutes in our reviews because it's not widespread enough yet, so agree w/yours
Well DLSS 2.0 is often better than native resolution, mainly due to the artifacts that TAA bring to an image.
Can you imagine how long reviews would take it they had to test every driver option? Where does it end?
That's why it matters whether its native to the game or not.
I do agree that Hardware Unboxed shouldn't be punished in this way by Nvidia though.
Why is the bolded statement an issue?https://twitter.com/HardwareUnboxed/status/1337257811625955329
Not that I am defending Nvidia but you have to wonder about the above in bold it doubts credibility.
You also have to wonder why the video in question that Nvidia are against is not being mentioned by HU. HU do not want draw attention to the fact what Nvidia is saying is true ?
Just being Devils Advocate.
According to Nvidia too good of a job.Almost like they do a pretty good job of not leaning heavily in either direction